<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A long day! Sunday Mar 15,09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/2009/03/a-long-day-sunday-mar-1509/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/2009/03/a-long-day-sunday-mar-1509/</link>
	<description>A log of my passage on the tall ship Picton Castle Nov. 2008 to May 2009</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/2009/03/a-long-day-sunday-mar-1509/#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/2009/03/a-long-day-sunday-mar-1509/#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment John!

I should have paced them out better these balks are closer to 35' long and more like 18" thick   which would make them more than 2 tons if neutrally buoyant.

FWIW According to  this cool site:
 "http://www.allhandsondeck.org/building/lesson4_home.php" a naval cannon in the 19th century weighed around 230 lbs/lb of shot so an 18 pounder weighed two tons.

KJ
P.S. Susie says 'Hi' and made me promise to mention her occasionally for you :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment John!</p>
<p>I should have paced them out better these balks are closer to 35&#8242; long and more like 18&#8243; thick   which would make them more than 2 tons if neutrally buoyant.</p>
<p>FWIW According to  this cool site:<br />
 &#8220;http://www.allhandsondeck.org/building/lesson4_home.php&#8221; a naval cannon in the 19th century weighed around 230 lbs/lb of shot so an 18 pounder weighed two tons.</p>
<p>KJ<br />
P.S. Susie says &#8216;Hi&#8217; and made me promise to mention her occasionally for you <img src='http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnR</title>
		<link>http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/2009/03/a-long-day-sunday-mar-1509/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4kconsulting.com/pictoncastle/2009/03/a-long-day-sunday-mar-1509/#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>Hi KJ, thanks for your very interesting and well done blog and pictures. I think that the 15 March entry regarding the lumber has a glitch. The lumber floated and hence weighed bit less than 64 lbs/cubic foot (density seawater). If these guys were 20' x 18" x  12" they have 30 cubic foot of wood. This means they can't weigh more than 1800 pounds, bit less than one ton. Other than that one nit, nothing else to pick! Keep up the good work, say "Hi!" to Susie for me, best, John R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi KJ, thanks for your very interesting and well done blog and pictures. I think that the 15 March entry regarding the lumber has a glitch. The lumber floated and hence weighed bit less than 64 lbs/cubic foot (density seawater). If these guys were 20&#8242; x 18&#8243; x  12&#8243; they have 30 cubic foot of wood. This means they can&#8217;t weigh more than 1800 pounds, bit less than one ton. Other than that one nit, nothing else to pick! Keep up the good work, say &#8220;Hi!&#8221; to Susie for me, best, John R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
